Date: 24 April 2017 at 01:58
Subject: TO ALL BANKS - ILLEGAL TRADERS Final Immunity Offer With Treason Charge
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, complaint.info@financial-ombud
Directors of Optima Legal Services, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Serious Fraud Office, Banks & Building Societies, Financial Ombudsman, Financial Conduct Authority, Solicitors, Bailiffs, Agents, Courts, Magistrates, Judges,
The above named are guilty of Treason by failing to stop crimes by solicitors, bailiffs and their agents routinely violating the Oath to God to maintain God's laws to serve and protect God's children, committing Treason, see evidence of theft, fraud, perjury, extortion, property heist, attempted corporate manslaughter in the Romford County Court during a one-sided hearing before a District judge Lewis on 23 February 2017, to steal 3 Peel Drive, Ilford, Essex, IG5 0JR, whilst I was abroad on a family medical emergency and my friends who attended the court, were barred from preventing corporate mass crimes, after the full proof set of the Powerful Paedophiles was submitted to the Royal Commission in July 2016 and is due for settlement in the sum of One Hundred Million pounds, which the above Directors are liable for.
Please note 3 Peel Drive is outside the jurisdiction of the criminal UK PLC corporation, being a Non-Governmental delegates office of www.swissindo.news, based in Indonesia, under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Indonesia which has ordered 100 years jail for anyone who obstructs the work of the delegates mandate of Prosperity payments 1-11 of www.swissindo.news.
Pursuant to the Geneva Convention 1930 a number of corporate governments such as the United Kingdom PLC and therefore all companies/corporations registered there-under and their agents, anywhere in the world, such as Missionaries, Ministers, Courts, Charities, Religious Institutions, professional & regulatory bodies, Central, local Governments, Quangos, public services, public offices, Brotherhoods, Sisterhoods, Secret Societies such as Freemasons, Knights of Columbanus, Opus Die, International Order of Nine Angels are operating illegally outside consent, under counterfeit currency, slave trading with humans, men, women & children, due to their bankruptcy and insolvency. This is evidenced by the Gold Standard Act Amendment Bill 227, 21 September 1931 [suspended] and the subsequent Uniform Commercial code (“UCc” International Law) to trade honourably under gold currency.
www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-503, www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-504, www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-505, www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308
This is a final Immunity Offer with Treason Notice, to cease all dishonourable trading outside consent, within 12 hours, failing which this is a Dissolution Notice & Treason Notice with seizure of the total assets of United Kingdom PLC and Northern Ireland including removal from office all the above named dishonourable individuals and companies registered thereunder, under the UCC Notice of Dishonour under UCC 3503, 4 & 5, without prejudice UCC 1-308 if the remedies sought to cease treason in public office and implement Gold currency of www.swissindo.net are not provided forthwith in 12 hours. Prosperity funds of www.swissindo.net will only be payable to honourable public officials under the oath to God to serve and protect God's children under God’s Laws.
AND I make this Solemn Declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true, and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835
Without Prejudice UCc 1308: A party that with explicit reservation of privileges performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the privileges reserved.Contract revoked, rejected, denied and dishonoured, UCc 3503, 3504, 3505 without prejudice, UCc 1308
Neelu of the Berry & Chaudhari clans
On behalf of God's children www.swissindo.news
NEELU BERRY: COURT ORDER TO REPOSSESS HOME 10 MAR 17Neelu Berry court order :
Neelu Court Order
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: lou lotus <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 7 January 2016 at 19:54
Subject: Fwd: NEELU in Blackfriars Crown Court before Judge Deva Pillay Court 3 at 10am on Friday 8 Jan 2016
Dear friends and family
Please support the Hampstead silent in my attempts at countercharges against the satanic cult in these proceedings
Case Management Hearing
in Blackfriars Crown Court
before Judge Deva Pillay Court 3
at 10am on Friday 8 Jan 2016
Crown V Neelu Berry
false allegations by CPS & Police of intimidation, allegedly made by Hampstead Church satanic cult members, but witness statement is not signed by key witness (SD, who failed to turn up in lower court and told judge she would never attend), for alleged publication on internet – which is evidence of cover-up of serious crimes against babies and children see IPCC report on second link below
Southwark Underground on Jubilee line 7 min walk
Borough Underground on Northern Line 10 min walk
Look forward to seeing you
Please note although this is Blackfriars Crown Court, the nearest tube is not Blackfriars but Southwark
and it is NOT AT THE SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT – VERY CONFUSING INDEED!
Woman cleared of ‘vexing’ Hampstead priest during ‘anti-Satanic’ protest14:24 08 October 2015
On March 22, she was alleged to have taken part in a protest of about 30 people outside the church, relating to disproven allegations it was home to a Satanic child abuse ring.
Just days before, these allegations were found by a High Court judge to be a “fantasy” and “nothing other than utter nonsense”.
During the protest, Ms Berry, of Peel Drive, Ilford, was alleged to have filmed the vicar, asking him “inappropriate questions” about child abuse, and causing him distress. She was also accused of having to be escorted out of the church building after allegedly banging on the doors and disrupting a Sunday service.
She was charged under the archaic Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction Act 1860, a law rarely used.
Denying all charges, she appeared at Highbury Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday.
But the trial into her case collapsed and she was cleared of any wrongdoing after the prosecution failed to provide any evidence against her.
The court heard how two witnesses due to give evidence were not present, with one withdrawing her statement because she was allegedly scared of repercussions. The other witness was abroad.
Prosecutors applied to adjourn the trial but the judge refused, saying the delays to this case were already “scandalous”. The trial date had been put back earlier in the year after prior problems with witnesses.
While describing the charges as “serious”, involving something upsetting allegedly being said to a five-year-old child, Judge Jacobs noted Ms Berry had already attended court four times and had been at no fault for the delays. He added: “The fault lies at the door of the crown. Ms Berry has a right to have the matter dealt with.”
Her defence, Ms Callinan, said Ms Berry was a woman of good character and suggested this was a case of “mistaken identity”.
Describing her client as a “vulnerable defendant in terms of her health”, she added that an adjournment “would be a complete waste of public money” and that the case against her was “weak”.
Ms Berry was cleared of all charges.
A spokesman for the Crown Prosecution Service said: “While we were aware that two of the witnesses in this case were not available to attend the trial, we were unable to determine whether their evidence was essential to the case until we received the CCTV from the police.
“This was not received until the afternoon before the trial. Unfortunately when the CCTV was reviewed it did not provide sufficient evidence without the evidence of the two witnesses.
“On the day of trial we asked for an adjournment, however, this was refused and we had no choice but to offer no evidence. Any decision by the CPS does not imply any finding concerning guilt or criminal conduct; the CPS makes decisions only according to the test set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors and it is applied in all decisions on whether or not to prosecute.”